Reviews

 
“A new field is born—evolutionary toxicology*—and Monosson has opened the door for us.”
*While I really appreciate the comment, I need to note that back in 1994, John Bickham and Michael Smolen wrote about Evolutionary Toxicology, concluding that “…it is likely that most toxic chemicals in the environment will affect evolutionary processes.” Though they were talking modern times – the sentiment I think is similar. So I would propose that the term evolutionary toxicology applies both to geological time periods as in Evolution in a Toxic World, and to modern times as discussed by Bickham and Smolen.
*********************
Presents a slightly more technical topic and provides a much abbreviated set of stories to illustrate this super interesting idea. Prior to reading this I actually didn’t find evolution all that super interesting of a topic (shhh… don’t tell Bio1A) but this book really made me love evolutionary biology. Evolution in a Toxic World is a bit more technical than The Poisoner’s Handbook and a great way to put all of those details from NST110 into context.
**********************************
“…it does provide detailed information about how life evolved to survive everything that our planet, other organisms and its own cells can throw at it through some fascinating examples.”

Science Illustrated

**********************

“Monosson posits that the field of toxicology should look to evolution to understand biological responses to today’s chemical threats.”

Conservation

***********************

“A toxicologist traces how life evolved to deal with toxic substances and how this plays into chemical exposures today.”

Science News

************************

Evolution in a Toxic World addresses the challenges posed to life on earth by a plethora of toxic threats. There are chapters dedicated to ozone, oxygen, metals, assorted chemical agents, cancer, etc. … The book serves as an excellent introduction to the topic of toxicology and evolution for the college student or general reader.”

Science Books and Films
*************************
“This 222-page book is a thought-provoking summary of an important but often ignored subject matter, evnironmental toxicology.”

************************

BioScience Review by Judith S. Weis

“The book is written in an accessible style and is aimed at the general public, as well as at scientists. The third-person scientific writing is interspersed with personal anecdotes and thoughts, which should help to make the book more appealing.”

**************************

REVIEWS FROM THE REV: “Evolution in a Toxic World: How Life Responds to Chemical Threats” by Emily Monosson

“Evolution in a Toxic World” is, in some ways, a story of the evolution of one toxicologist’s personal and professional evolution in a field that is, by her account, at last merging with the insights available from the field of evolutionary studies.  For it turns out that toxicology has much more to concern itself with than the occasional dramatic case of humans being poisoned by their own chemical creations.  The emerging reality about the interactions of thousands upon thousands of “new” chemical compounds with the evolved biology of every living thing is an area that requires careful study and new ways of defining just what dangers might lurk in our present and future environments (as altered by human activity).

The reality is this: we industrious humans have liberated tons of heavy metals and naturally-occuring materials from the earth through our mining and burning and manufacturing.  Along the way we have invented chemical compounds that have never existed in nature.  It stands to reason that such an environment — changed as it is from the one we evolved in — might produce some surprises in our biology, and this is proving to be the case.

But this case is sometimes subtle and nuanced — not always a tale of deathly poisons, but often of chemicals whose molecular shapes resemble hormones, say, and that fool living cells into taking them up in ways that alters reproductive cycles or DNA.

This book is not alarmist, even if there are alarming revelations as the author takes us along on her own journey into our evolutionary past in order to better understand the task that is before scientists such as her (and humankind).  it is a well-written, cogent and enjoyable book to read, well worth your time if for no other reason than the fact that you have to live your life in this new chemical world we have created.

I highly recommend this book.

t.n.s.r. bob

 The rev gives it four Dimetrodons out of four!

******************************

Evolution in a toxic world | Book Review | Grrrl Scientist

The author investigates how from its very beginning, life evolved to deal with all sorts of toxins, a process that continues today, and she predicts what the future may hold.

Earth is a hostile place — and that’s even before one starts attending school. Even when life first sparked into being, it had to evolve defenses to deal with a number of toxins, such as damaging ultraviolet light, then there were toxic elements ranging from iron to oxygen to overcome, later, there was DDT and other toxic chemicals and of course, there are all those dreaded cancers.

In Evolution In A Toxic World: How Life Responds To Chemical Threats [Island Press; 2012: Guardian BookshopAmazon UK;Amazon US], environmental toxicologist Emily Monosson outlines three billion years of evolution designed to withstand the hardships of living on this deadly planet, giving rise to processes ranging from excretion, transformation or stowing harmful substances. The subtitle erroneously suggests these toxins are only chemical in nature, but the author actually discusses more than this one subclass of toxins.

The method that arose to deal with these toxins is a plethora of specialised, targeted proteins — enzymes that capture toxins and repair their damages. By following the origin and progression of these shared enzymes that evolved to deal with specific toxins, the author traces their history from the first bacteria-like organisms to modern humans. Comparing the new field evolutionary toxicology to biomedical research, Dr Monosson notes: “In light of evolution, biomedical researchers are now asking questions that might seem antithetical to medicine”. Continuing this analogy, she frames her argument thus:

“Simply put,” write Randolph Nesse and co-authors in the journal Science, “… training in evolutionary thinking can help both biomedical researchers and clinicians ask useful questions that they might not otherwise pose.” The same could be said for researchers and practitioners of toxicology. [p. 3]

http://www.theguardian.com/science/grrlscientist/2012/oct/02/1

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: